Abstract

Processing of negative affective pictures typically leads to desynchronization of alpha-to-beta frequencies (ERD) and synchronization of gamma frequencies (ERS). Given that in predictive coding higher frequencies have been associated with prediction errors, while lower frequencies have been linked to expectations, we tested the hypothesis that alpha-to-beta ERD and gamma ERS induced by aversive pictures are associated with expectations and prediction errors, respectively. We recorded EEG while volunteers were involved in a probabilistically cued affective picture task using three different negative valences to produce expectations and prediction errors. Our data show that alpha-to-beta band activity after stimulus presentation was related to the expected valence of the stimulus as predicted by a cue. The absolute mismatch of the expected and actual valence, which denotes an absolute prediction error was related to increases in alpha, beta and gamma band activity. This demonstrates that top-down predictions and bottom-up prediction errors are represented in typical spectral patterns associated with affective picture processing. This study provides direct experimental evidence that negative affective picture processing can be described by neuronal predictive coding computations.

Highlights

  • Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL

  • Our data show that key variables required for affective picture processing in the context of a generative model are correlated with event-related alpha-to-beta and gamma activity

  • Alpha-to-beta increases associated with the mismatch of stimulus valence and expected valence imply working memory demands as well as the suppression of prediction updates, whereas gamma increases suggest a role of bottom-up processing of prediction errors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—Project-ID 422744262–TRR 289. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. The study was approved by the Ethics board of the Hamburg Medical Association (PV4745). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all partici

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.