Abstract
We show that, up to term equivalence, the only minimal idempotent varieties that are not congruence modular are the variety of sets and the variety of semilattices. From this it follows that a minimal idempotent variety that is not congruence distributive is term equivalent to the variety of sets, the variety of semilattices, or a variety of affine modules over a simple ring.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
