Abstract
The purpose of this note is two‐fold. One is to pay a belated tribute to an old teacher of mine, Allyn Young. The other is a perhaps overly ambitious attempt to supplement the excellent review of growth theory of 1964, by arguing that there is a direct line between neo‐classical growth theory as Young left it in 1928 and present day theorising; a link, I fear, that is not generally recognised. What originality it may possess lies in expanding upon the implications of Young's argument. But in such a wide and important field as growth, a somewhat different synthesis of existing but scattered ideas seems worth attempting.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
