Abstract

IntroductionTwo recent models are in use for analysis of allosteric drug action at receptor sites remote from orthosteric binding sites. One is an allosteric two-state mechanical model derived in 2000 by David Hall. The other is an extended operational model developed in 2007 by Arthur Christopoulos’s group. The models are valid in pharmacology, enzymology, transportology as well as several other fields of biology involving allosteric concentration effects.ResultsI show here that Hall’s model for interactions between an orthoster, an alloster, and a receptive unit is the best choice of model both for simulation and analysis of allosteric concentration-responses at equilibrium or steady-state.ConclusionsAs detailed knowledge of receptors systems becomes available, systems with several pathways and states and/ or more than two binding sites should be analysed by extended forms of the Hall model rather than for instance a Hill type exponentiation of terms as introduced in non-mechanistic (operational) model approaches; yielding semi-quantitative estimates of actual system parameters based on Hill’s unlikely simultaneity model for G protein-coupled receptors.

Highlights

  • Two recent models are in use for analysis of allosteric drug action at receptor sites remote from orthosteric binding sites

  • I show here that Hall’s model for interactions between an orthoster, an alloster, and a receptive unit is the best choice of model both for simulation and analysis of allosteric concentration-responses at equilibrium or steady-state

  • Optimal allosteric models are in great demand, since mechanistic simulations may be combined with structural analysis of alloster binding, receptor multi-merization and association of molecules as G proteins, arrestins, and RAMPs into synthesis of Quantitative structure-activity-relationship (QSAR) for ligand binding and receptor activation [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]

Read more

Summary

Conclusions

As detailed knowledge of receptors systems becomes available, systems with several pathways and states and/ or more than two binding sites should be analysed by extended forms of the Hall model rather than for instance a Hill type exponentiation of terms as introduced in non-mechanistic (operational) model approaches; yielding semi-quantitative estimates of actual system parameters based on Hill’s unlikely simultaneity model for G protein-coupled receptors

Background
Methods
Results and discussion
Conclusion
Ledford H
18. Bindslev N
22. Hall DA
31. Ehlert FJ
34. Kenakin TP
39. Birdsall NJ
51. Furchgott RF
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call