Abstract
Evolution can involve periods of rapid divergent adaptation and expansion in the range of diversity, but evolution can also be relatively conservative over certain timescales due to functional, genetic‐developmental, and ecological constraints. One way in which evolution may be conservative is in terms of allometry, the scaling relationship between the traits of organisms and body size. Here, we investigate patterns of allometric conservatism in the evolution of bird beaks with beak size and body size data for a representative sample of over 5000 extant bird species within a phylogenetic framework. We identify clades in which the allometric relationship between beak size and body size has remained relatively conserved across species over millions to tens of millions of years. We find that allometric conservatism is nonetheless punctuated by occasional shifts in the slopes and intercepts of allometric relationships. A steady accumulation of such shifts through time has given rise to the tremendous diversity of beak size relative to body size across birds today. Our findings are consistent with the Simpsonian vision of macroevolution, with evolutionary conservatism being the rule but with occasional shifts to new adaptive zones.
Highlights
Impact Summary The traits of organisms do not evolve independently, but rather tend to evolve predictably in relation to each other
To what extent is diversity constrained in this way and over what timescales are such constraints broken to allow the range of life’s diversity to expand? We address these fundamental questions about the tempo and mode of evolution with comparative data on beak size and body size of the world’s birds
We find that the relationship between beak size and body size generally remains stable among sets of related species over millions of years
Summary
Impact Summary The traits of organisms do not evolve independently, but rather tend to evolve predictably in relation to each other. We find that the relationship between beak size and body size generally remains stable among sets of related species over millions of years. According to Simpson, this pattern of evolution is punctuated by occasional shifts to new adaptive zones triggered by ecological opportunity in new environments or following mass extinctions, or they may be spurred by the evolution of key innovations in functional traits. Taken together, this implies an overall pattern of generally conservative evolution, broken by occasional bursts of rapid directional evolution over long macroevolutionary or “megaevolutionary” timescales. Limits on ecological opportunity may prevent lineages from breaking free from conserved allometric relationships to adapt to new niches (e.g., Grant and Grant 2006)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.