Abstract

DNA polymerase III mis-insertion may, where not corrected by its 3′→ 5′ exonuclease or the mismatch repair (MMR) function, result in all possible non-cognate base pairs in DNA generating base substitutions. The most thermodynamically unstable base pair, the cytosine (C)⋅C mismatch, destabilizes adjacent base pairs, is resistant to correction by MMR in Escherichia coli, and its repair mechanism remains elusive. We present here in vitro evidence that C⋅C mismatch can be processed by base excision repair initiated by the E. coli formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) protein. The kcat for C⋅C is, however, 2.5 to 10 times lower than for its primary substrate 8-oxoguanine (oxo8G)⋅C, but approaches those for 5,6-dihydrothymine (dHT)⋅C and thymine glycol (Tg)⋅C. The KM values are all in the same range, which indicates efficient recognition of C⋅C mismatches in DNA. Fpg activity was also exhibited for the thymine (T)⋅T mismatch and for N4- and/or 5-methylated C opposite C or T, Fpg activity being enabled on a broad spectrum of DNA lesions and mismatches by the flexibility of the active site loop. We hypothesize that Fpg plays a role in resolving C⋅C in particular, but also other pyrimidine⋅pyrimidine mismatches, which increases survival at the cost of some mutagenesis.

Highlights

  • All possible base mismatches in DNA are formed in Escherichia coli by the replicative DNA polymerase (Pol) III holoenzyme

  • Each ssDNA oligomer was annealed to a complementary strand, the above defined residue being placed opposite non-cognate C or T

  • Similar activity was demonstrated for T·T, which is a substrate for the E. coli mismatch repair (MMR) system (Iyer et al, 2006)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

All possible base mismatches in DNA are formed in Escherichia coli by the replicative DNA polymerase (Pol) III holoenzyme. E. coli contains a few trans-lesion synthesis (TLS) Pols that can insert cognate or non-cognate bases opposite damaged and undamaged template bases, including at apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites. A number of studies suggest that Pol III generally leaves the processivity (β) clamp at the replication fork, if a mispair such as C·C evades the Pol III 3 → 5 proofreading exonuclease (exo) function. This can be replaced by the TLS Pol IV (DinB), which is able to continue synthesis from the mismatch to a much greater extent than Pol III (Wagner and Nohmi, 2000).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call