Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the influence of cortical and cancellous bone structure on the biomechanical properties of all-suture and conventional anchors and compare the morphological bone damage after their failure. The hypothesis of the study is that all-suture anchor pullout is less invasive and that the pullout force is influenced by the cortical thickness.MethodsThirty human humeri were biomechanically tested as follows: starting with a load cycle from 20 to 50 N, a stepwise increase of the upper peak force by 0.05 N for each cycle at a rate of 1 Hz was performed. Analysis included maximum pullout strength for three different anchor implantation angles (45°, 90°, 110°) of the two anchor types. After anchor pullout, every sample underwent micro-CT analysis. Bone mineral density (BMD) and cortical thickness were determined at the anchor implantation site. Furthermore, the diameter of the cortical defect and the volume of the bone cavity were identified.ResultsThe maximum pullout strength of all-suture anchors demonstrates a strong correlation to the adjacent cortical thickness (r = 0.82, p ≤ 0.05) with at least 0.4 mm needed to withstand 200 N. No correlation could be seen in conventional anchors. Moreover, no correlation could be detected for local BMD in both anchors. All-suture anchors show a significantly narrower cortical defect as well as a smaller bone cavity following pullout (4.3 ± 1.3 mm vs. 5.3 ± 0.9 mm, p = 0.037; 141 mm3 vs. 212 mm3; p = 0.009). The cortical defect is largest if the anchors are placed at a 45° angle.ConclusionIn contrast to conventional anchors, the pullout force of all-suture anchors depends on the thickness of the humeral cortex. Furthermore, all-suture anchors show a significantly smaller cortical defect as well as decreased bone damage in the case of pullout. Therefore, the clinical implication of this study is that all-suture anchors are advantageous due to their bone preserving ability. Also, intraoperative decortication should not be performed and cortical thickness should be preoperatively evaluated to decrease the risk of anchor failure.

Highlights

  • All-suture anchors (ASA) are increasingly used in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and are entirely composed of suture material [2, 4, 20, 22]

  • Potential correlation between Bone mineral density (BMD), cortical thickness and pullout strength was displayed by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient through linear regression analysis

  • Measurements of the cortical defect after anchor pullout showed an almost 20% smaller defect induced by all-suture anchors compared to conventional anchors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

All-suture anchors (ASA) are increasingly used in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and are entirely composed of suture material [2, 4, 20, 22]. The bone–anchor interface is constituted by anchor deployment against the inner cortical wall of the bore hole through pulling by the surgeon. During this process, the diameter of the all-suture anchor increases while the initial construct length is reduced [3, 10, 11]. In contrast to conventional suture anchors (CA), this type of fixation is thought to be bone-preserving due to the removal of less bone during insertion or pullout [3, 10, 19]. In contrast to conventional suture anchors, ASA are thought to be more dependent on the cortical bone than the cancellous bone where they are inserted for fixation [11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call