Abstract
This paper focuses on the impact of the global financial and economic crises on the binding force of contracts from the perspective of Italian law. The analysis relies on a preliminary distinction between different factual consequences of the crises, in view of their potential availability as grounds for derogation to the principle “pacta sunt servanda”. The paper uses those factual circumstances as hypotheticals to illustrate the operation of Italian law, highlighting that impossibility of performance, supervening excessive onerousness of performance, excessive devaluation of the counter-performance and failure of presupposed conditions are all available doctrines under which an exception to the principle of “pacta sunt servanda” may be sought. The paper argues that all these different doctrines share the same rationale, that is the existence of an implied contract term of “rebus sic stantibus”, which may lead to the remedy of termination. The paper concludes that if any remedy is to be granted, termination is to be preferred to renegotiation or revision, as the former is more likely to lead to a reassessment of the price reflecting the new market conditions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.