Abstract

Simple SummaryWorking equids are often absent from higher level policy interventions, and the global standard of their welfare is low. Understanding the social and cultural context of their contributions to human livelihoods generates evidence supporting the importance of their inclusion in livestock welfare programmes. Although there is increasing evidence globally that working equids contribute to women’s livelihoods and that women facilitate equid welfare, there is a well recognised gender gap in access to extension services. This study aims to investigate how working equids contribute to women’s livelihoods in six communities in Guatemala, using information from 34 face-to-face interviews. Results show that working equids support women’s livelihoods by generating income, saving time, feeding livestock and reducing domestic drudgery. Thirty-two women played a major role in the daily husbandry of working equids, and 31 expressed an interest in gaining more knowledge in equid care. This study explores the relationship between working equids and women in a local context, using the concept of ‘One Welfare’, and investigates the knowledge gaps that exist in the daily husbandry of horses, donkeys and mules. It emphasises the need for equid welfare organisations to understand women’s roles in their target communities and recognise what prevents women from accessing educational resources.It is widely assumed that working equid husbandry is carried out by men, and women are often not recognised as facilitating equid welfare. The aim of this study is to investigate how working equids contribute to women’s livelihoods in six of the World Horse Welfare programme target communities in Guatemala and determine what roles women have in their care. Thirty-four face-to-face interviews were carried out and data were analysed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. This study found that working equids support women by reducing domestic drudgery, generating income, feeding livestock and saving time. Thirty-two women played a major role in the care of one or more equids, and overall, women did not feel that they knew enough about equid husbandry. Thirty-one women said they would attend training opportunities if the advertising was clear and they felt that women were able to join. This study recognises the contribution of working equids to women’s livelihoods, describes the roles women play in equid husbandry and addresses the discrepancies between women’s roles and their capacity to undertake these tasks. This emphasises the need for extension services to include and cater for women, improving equid welfare and their ability to continue supporting women’s livelihoods.

Highlights

  • There are approximately 116 million equids in the world [1], the majority of which are used as working animals in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs) to reduce domestic drudgery [2], improve people’s social welfare and provide direct and indirect income [3,4,5].Because equids contribute to livelihoods in ways that are different to that of food producing animals, policy makers often fail to recognise their importance, and working equids tend to be absent in most livestock related initiatives and policies [4]

  • This study aims to investigate (1) how working equids contribute to women’s livelihoods in the Chimaltenango region, (2) the roles women have in caring for their equids and their capacity to undertake these tasks, (3) the opportunities women have to acquire new knowledge about their equids, (4) whether women find existing training programmes helpful and accessible and (5) the areas of equid care on which they would like more information

  • Thirty-two women lived with their parents or husbands, and two women lived in women-headed households

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Because equids contribute to livelihoods in ways that are different to that of food producing animals, policy makers often fail to recognise their importance, and working equids tend to be absent in most livestock related initiatives and policies [4]. This leaves them vulnerable to low welfare standards as the inherent value of their health and welfare is neglected [5]. Policy makers have traditionally associated men with owning working equids, and livestock initiatives aimed at women have tended to focus on poultry, dairy cows and small ruminants [6,7].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call