Abstract
INTRODUCTION Electrochemical oscillations, which are attractive phenomena from the viewpoint of dynamic self-organization of molecular systems, have been reported in a variety of electrochemical reactions [1]. Among them, the H2O2 reduction at Pt electrodes in H2SO4 solutions (H2O2 + 2H+ + 2e- → 2H2O) has an especially unique feature where nine kinds of oscillations, named oscillations A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I are observed [2-4]. Oscillation A appeared in the potential region of the formation of under-potential deposited H (upd-H) which suppressed the H2O2 reduction, whereas oscillation B appeared in the region of hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Oscillations C and D appeared when a small amount of Cl- or Br- ions, which adsorbed on a Pt surface, were added to electrolysis solutions. Oscillation E appeared when a single-crystal Pt(111) electrode was used because H2O2 was autocatalytically reduced especially on the Pt(111) surface. Oscillations F and G appeared in the presence of a small amount of Br- ions when a Pt(111) or Pt(100) electrode was used. Oscillations H and I appeared when the cations such as Na+ and K+ were added to electrolysis solutions [2-4]. In the presence of the cations, the transport rate of H+ to the electrode surface by the electromigration decreased and consequently the local pH at the electrode surface became basic during the H2O2 reduction. In the vicinity of the surface where the pH was basic, H2O2 dissociated to form HO2 - ion, which was electrochemically reduced to OH- or oxidized to O2. Oscillation H was tentatively caused by the interaction between the autocatalytic H2O2 reduction and the electrooxidation of HO2 - [2, 3]. On the other hand, oscillation I was probably caused by the suppression of the reduction of HO2 - due to the formation of upd-H [4]. Recently, a new oscillation, which was named oscillation J, was found to appear during the H2O2 reduction in the presence of the cations. In this presentation, the conditions for the appearance of oscillation J and its mechanism will be discussed. RESULTS and DISCUSSION Figure 1 shows the current (I) – potential (E) curves for a Pt-disc electrode. When the solution was 0.1 M H2SO4 + 0.1 M H2O2 (Fig. 1a), the H2O2 reduction occurred in the potential region below ca. 0.8 V under potential controlled conditions. The reduction was suppressed, that is, an N-shaped negative differential resistance (N-NDR) appeared, at around ca. –0.1 V due the formation of upd-H. Oscillation A appeared as a current oscillation at the potentials of the N-NDR and the HER due to the H+ reduction occurred in the potential region below ca. –0.15 V. Oscillation A did not appeared under current controlled conditions (Fig. 1b). When the concentration of H2O2 was 0.3 M, oscillation B appeared both under potential controlled conditions and under current controlled ones (Figs. 1c and 1d). The I – E curves were strongly affected by adding Na2SO4 or K2SO4 to the solution because the local pH at the electrode surface became basic during the H2O2 reduction in the presence of Na+ or K+ [2-4]. When the solution was 0.1 M H2SO4 + 0.3 M H2O2 + 0.1 M Na2SO4 (Figs. 1e and 1f), oscillations A and B did not appear. However, oscillation I appeared at around –0.8 V under potential controlled conditions. The HER due to the water reduction occurred in the potential region below ca. –1.0 V. When the H2O2 concentration was high, e.g., 0.9 M (Figs. 1g and h), oscillations I and H appeared under potential controlled conditions and under current controlled conditions, respectively. The new oscillation, oscillation J, appeared at around –1.15 V under potential controlled conditions and also appeared in the potential range between –0.4 and –1.5 V under current controlled conditions. Oscillation J synchronized with the behavior of hydrogen bubbles formed by the HER. Thus, the bubble evolution probably played a role in the mechanism of oscillation J. REFERENCES [1] M. Orlik, Self-Organization in Electrochemical Systems I, Springer, Berlin (2012). [2] Y. Mukouyama, M. Hasegawa, S. Yamamoto, S. Nakanishi, H. Okamoto, ECS Trans., 58 (25) 99-107, 2014. [3] Y. Mukouyama, M. Hasegawa, S. Nakanishi, ECS Trans., 64 (2014) accepted. [4] Y. Mukouyama, M. Hasegawa, S. Nakanishi, ECS Trans., 64 (2014) accepted. FIGURE CAPTION Figure 1. The I – E curves for 0.1 M H2SO4 + x M H2O2 + y M Na2SO4, where (x, y) = (0.1, 0), (0.3, 0), (0.3, 0.1), and (0.9, 0.1) from top to bottom, measured (left) under current controlled conditions and (right) under current controlled conditions. Figure 1
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.