Abstract

There has been a long and wide‐ranging literature on the problems of the individual's adjustment to the demands of work organisations. In the 1950s, Argyris and Merton argued that the needs of mature individuals and the properties of modern bureaucracies were incongruent. In a later work, Argyris argued that the larger the organisation, the greater the incongruence and the greater the suppression of individuality. Maslow argued that suppression was inevitable if two variables interacted: increasing size and uncertain environments. Methods of suppression also attracted attention in the 60s; Ziller noted the techniques included formality, mobility, conformity, dominant leaders and a paucity of information sharing.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.