Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) could be regarded as one of the most innovative and high technologies all over the world to cope with the fossil fuel energy resource crisis and environmental pollution issues. As the initiatory task of EV charging station (EVCS) construction, site selection play an important part throughout the whole life cycle, which is deemed to be multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problem involving many experts and many conflicting attributes. In this paper, a grey relational analysis (GRA) method is investigated to tackle the probabilistic uncertain linguistic MAGDM in which the attribute weights are completely unknown information. Firstly, the definition of the expected value is then employed to objectively derive the attribute weights based on the CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method. Then, the optimal alternative is chosen by calculating largest relative relational degree from the probabilistic uncertain linguistic positive ideal solution (PULPIS) which considers both the largest grey relational coefficient from the PULPIS and the smallest grey relational coefficient from the probabilistic uncertain linguistic negative ideal solution (PULNIS). Finally, a numerical case for site selection of electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS) is designed to illustrate the proposed method. The result shows the approach is simple, effective and easy to calculate.

Highlights

  • In many existing multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) issues, it has been assumed that almost all assessing information is expressed with crisp numbers (Pamucar & Cirovic, 2015)

  • The motivation of such paper can be outlined as follows: (1) the grey relational analysis (GRA) method is extended by probabilistic uncertain linguistic term sets (PULTSs) with unknown weight information; (2) the scoring function of PULTs is employed to objectively derive the attribute weights based on the CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method; (3) the probabilistic uncertain linguistic GRA (PUL-GRA) method is proposed to solve the probabilistic uncertain linguistic MAGDM problems; (4) a case study for site selection of EV charging station (EVCS) is supplied to show the developed approach; (5) some comparative studies are provided with the probabilistic uncertain linguistic weighted average (PULWA) operator, ULWA operator and PUL-TOPSIS method to give effect to the rationality of PULGRA method

  • /1⁄41 where 1⁄2L/, U/Šðp/Þ depicts the uncertain linguistic term 1⁄2L/, U/Š associated with the probability p/, L/, U/ are linguistic term sets, L/ U/, and #PULTðpÞ is the cardinality of PULTSðpÞ: In order to convenient computation, Lin et al (2018) normalized the PULTS PULTSðpÞ as NPULTSðpÞ 1⁄4 f1⁄2L/, U/Šð~p/Þj~p/ ! 0, / 1⁄4 1, 2, . . . , #NPULTSð~pÞ, P#NPULTSð~pÞ

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In many existing multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) issues, it has been assumed that almost all assessing information is expressed with crisp numbers. Y. He, Lei, et al (2019) defined the EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic uncertain linguistic information and its application to green supplier selection. The motivation of such paper can be outlined as follows: (1) the GRA method is extended by PULTSs with unknown weight information; (2) the scoring function of PULTs is employed to objectively derive the attribute weights based on the CRITIC method; (3) the probabilistic uncertain linguistic GRA (PUL-GRA) method is proposed to solve the probabilistic uncertain linguistic MAGDM problems; (4) a case study for site selection of EVCS is supplied to show the developed approach; (5) some comparative studies are provided with the PULWA operator, ULWA operator and PUL-TOPSIS method to give effect to the rationality of PULGRA method.

Preliminaries
GRA method for PUL-MAGDM with CRITIC weight
Build the probabilistic uncertain linguistic correlation coefficient matrix
A case study
A2 A3 A4 A5
Comparative analysis
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call