Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of predictive models applied to air quality estimation. Currently, among other global issues, there is a high concern about air pollution, for this reason, there are several air quality indicators, with carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ozone (O3) being the main ones. When the concentration level of an indicator exceeds an established air quality safety threshold, it is considered harmful to human health, therefore, in cities like London, there are monitoring systems for air pollutants. This study aims to compare the efficiency of stochastic and heuristic predictive models for forecasting ozone (O3) concentration to estimate London's air quality by analyzing an open dataset retrieved from the London Datastore portal. Models based on data analysis have been widely used in air quality forecasting. This paper develops four predictive models (autoregressive integrated moving average - ARIMA, support vector regression - SVR, neural networks (specifically, long-short term memory - LSTM) and Facebook Prophet). Experimentally, ARIMA models and LSTM are proved to reach the highest accuracy in predicting the concentration of air pollutants among the considered models. As a result, the comparative analysis of the loss function (root-mean-square error) reveled that ARIMA and LSTM are the most suitable, accomplishing a low error rate of 0.18 and 0.20, respectively.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.