Algorithmic Midline Approach to Perineal Urethrostomy is Associated With Long-term Success and High Patient Satisfaction

Abstract

PurposeTo assess surgical success and patient-reported outcomes of perineal urethrostomy via midline approach. Materials & MethodsCharts of patients undergoing primary perineal urethrostomy between May 2008 and June 2022 were reviewed. Background characteristics were assessed; success was defined as freedom from re-intervention. Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed using a cross-sectional phone survey. Several validated questionnaires were used to assess lower urinary tract symptoms, quality of life, and erectile dysfunction. ResultsAmong 1,768 urethroplasties performed over the study period, 103 patients (5.8%) underwent midline perineal urethrostomy. Surgery was successful in 95.1% of cases (98/103); 5 patients (4.9%) required re-intervention at a median of 8.7 months. Post-operative complications occurred in 5.8% of cases (6/103) and were both mild and self-limited.Forty-nine patients (47.6%) were reached via phone survey at a median of 61 months post-operatively. Some questions were not answered by all patients. Most patients (42/49, 86%) were satisfied or very satisfied with surgical results, and 82% (40/49) reported an improvement in their overall health. Most patients (31/41, 76%) were unbothered by sitting to urinate. Although 20% of patients (10/49) reported post-operative urinary symptoms that interfered “a lot” with their daily life, only 3 (6%) of these patients reported dissatisfaction with outcome. Regarding sexual function, 64% (27/42) reported indifference to or increased satisfaction with sexual encounters versus before surgery. The rate of de novo ED was 24% (12/49). ConclusionsThe midline approach to perineal urethrostomy provides excellent, durable success rates with high levels of patient satisfaction.