Abstract

The management of a patient presenting with unsatisfactory labor epidural analgesia poses a severe challenge for the anesthetist wanting to provide safe anesthetic care for a cesarean delivery. Early recognition of unsatisfactory labor analgesia allows for replacement of the epidural catheter. The decision to convert labor epidural analgesia to anesthesia for cesarean delivery is based on the urgency of the cesarean delivery, airway examination, and the existence of a residual sensory and motor block. We suggest an algorithm which is implemented in our department, based on the urgency of the cesarean delivery.

Highlights

  • Neuraxial blockade in obstetric anesthesia is considered the preferred method of analgesia for both vaginal and surgical deliveries

  • We suggest an algorithm to help guide anesthetic management in a situation where epidural analgesia is insufficient and anesthesia is requested for Cesarean delivery

  • Summary In summary, the management of a patient with unsatisfactory labor epidural analgesia poses a severe challenge for the anesthetist wanting to provide safe anesthetic care for a cesarean delivery

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neuraxial blockade in obstetric anesthesia is considered the preferred method of analgesia for both vaginal and surgical deliveries. Category 2 cesarean delivery (Figure 2) A more thorough assessment of the neuraxial block can be performed and should include the height, density and distribution of analgesia (unilateral or bilateral). Epidural sensory block should be assessed for the highest dermatomal level at which the patient is able to detect a controversial, a continuous spinal catheter is a viable option for cesarean delivery after failed epidural analgesia[34]. This option should be considered especially in patients where previous attempts to rescue labor epidural analgesia have been performed (withdrawal of the epidural catheter by 1 cm followed by top-up with local anesthetics and opioids). Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work

Hogan Q
24. Jenkins JG
27. Yentis SM
30. Menon R
34. Palmer CM
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call