Abstract

Individualized, precision feeding of dairy cattle may contribute to profitable and sustainable dairy production. Feeding strategies targeted at optimizing efficiency of individual cows, rather than groups of animals with similar characteristics, is a logical goal of individualized precision feeding. However, algorithms designed to make feeding recommendations for specific animals are scarce. The objective of this study was to develop and test 2 algorithms designed to improve feed efficiency of individual cows by supplementing total mixed rations (TMR) with varying types and amounts of top-dressed feedstuffs. Twenty-four Holstein dairy cows were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups as follows: a control group fed a common TMR ad libitum, a group fed individually according to algorithm 1, and a group fed individually according to algorithm 2. Algorithm 1 used a mixed-model approach with feed efficiency as the response variable and automated measurements of production parameters and top-dress type as dependent variables. Cow was treated as a random effect, and cow by top-dress interactions were included if significant. Algorithm 2 grouped cows based on top-dress response efficiency structure using a principal components and k-means clustering. Both algorithms were trained over a 36-d experimental period immediately before testing, and were updated weekly during the 35-d testing period. Production performance responses for dry matter intake (DMI), milk yield, milk fat percentage and yield, milk protein percentage and yield, and feed efficiency were analyzed using a mixed-effects model with fixed effects for feeding algorithm, top dress, week, and the 2- and 3-way interactions among these variables. Milk protein percentage and feed efficiency were significantly affected by the 3-way interaction of top dress, algorithm, and week, and DMI tended to be affected by this 3-way interaction. Feeding algorithm did not affect milk yield, milk fat yield, or milk protein yield. However, feeding costs were reduced, and hence milk revenue increased on the algorithm-fed cows. The efficacy of feeding algorithms differed by top dress and time, and largely relied on DMI shifts to modulate feed efficiency. The net result, for the cumulative feeding groups, was that cows in the algorithm 1 and 2 groups earned over $0.45 and $0.70 more per head per day in comparison to cows on the TMR control, respectively. This study yielded 2 candidate approaches for efficiency-focused, individualized feeding recommendations. Refinement of algorithm selection, development, and training approaches are needed to maximize production parameters through individualized feeding.

Highlights

  • Innovative dairy farm technologies have increased operation productivity, decreased costs per cow, and contributed tremendously to the financial success of dairy farmers (El-Osta and Morehart, 2000)

  • The algorithms used during the experimental testing period queried this training data to develop individualized animal feeding recommendations based on the goal of increasing individual cow feed efficiency (FE)

  • Dry matter intake was significantly affected by week (P = 0.02; Table 5) and tended to be affected by a 3-way interaction between top dress, algorithm, and week (P < 0.07; Table 5)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Innovative dairy farm technologies have increased operation productivity, decreased costs per cow, and contributed tremendously to the financial success of dairy farmers (El-Osta and Morehart, 2000). From a global study conducted in 2013, approximately 69% of producers reported use of precision dairy technologies on farms [e.g., pedometers to monitor activity, collars to monitor rumination, sensors in the milking parlor to measure milk yield (MY) and conductivity of milk; Borchers and Bewley, 2015]. Of the producers that used precision technologies, MY, cow activity, and mastitis were the most common activities monitored with the precision management technologies (Borchers and Bewley, 2015). Many dairy farmers felt that there was unused functionality in their precision management systems (Eastwood et al, 2016). These systems usually collect a variety of data on individual cows, but rarely is that data compiled and integrated to make informed decisions on how to more accurately feed or manage individuals.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call