Abstract
Some indefinites cannot be bound by adverbs of quantification or the generic operator. I argue that this datum follows from the internal syntax of indefinites: only those indefinites consisting of a minimal structure can be bound, bigger indefinites cannot. I present evidence from Spanish, Russian and English to support this claim. Two theoretical consequences follow. The first one is about wh-dependencies: I argue that wh-phrases cannot be regarded as noun phrases with an extra [wh] feature, but rather as very small indefinites without additional features. The second one involves exceptional scope: choice function approaches seem to run into a paradox that alternative approaches, such as Schwarszchild’s Singleton Indefinite approach, avoid. I also argue that an alternative semantic approach to binding resistance yields no fruit. Finally, I show that only small indefinites can be used as predicates, thus bolstering the approach taken in these pages.
Highlights
Very small indefinites: bare nouns and wh-determinersPart of the interest in bare nouns is that they can be interpreted as kinds or as indefinite noun phrases; in languages lacking a definite determiner, a bare noun can function as a definite noun phrase
Some indefinites cannot be bound by adverbs of quantification or the generic operator
Since Heim (1982), Kamp (1981) and their descendants it has been assumed that indefinite noun phrases are variables
Summary
Part of the interest in bare nouns is that they can be interpreted as kinds or as indefinite noun phrases; in languages lacking a definite determiner, a bare noun can function as a definite noun phrase Following in part this literature, I take it that these interpretations correlate with different types of silent syntactic structure: the kind interpretation is the result of projecting a NP while an indefinite interpretation involves a NumberP. In this language, a wh-determiner can be bound by an AoQ, as shown in the following two examples (one plural, one singular). In Russian bare singular noun phrases and wh-phrases can be bound by an AoQG while an indefinite determiner built on the wh-determiner cannot be. This confirms the hypothesis that the AoQG can only bind into small indefinites. The exact structure of XP is irrelevant for the purposes of this article
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have