Alfred Jules Ayer’s Logical Positivism: A Critical Examination and Its Relevance in Islamic Studies

Abstract

This article delves into the philosophical ideas of Alfred Jules Ayer, specifically focusing on his contributions to logical positivism. The research methodology employed is a literature review, utilizing a descriptive-analytical qualitative approach. The study is structured around four key aspects. Firstly, it provides an overview of the historical evolution of logical positivism. Secondly, it elucidates the theoretical framework of Alfred Jules Ayer’s logical positivism. Thirdly, it explores the criticisms leveled by Karl Popper against Ayer’s logical positivism, particularly concerning induction and verification. Lastly, the article investigates the relevance of Ayer’s concept of verification to the field of Islamic studies. The study concludes by discussing the applicability of Ayer’s verification concept to Islamic studies, drawing parallels with the concept of “tabayyun” in Islamic jurisprudence. “Tabayyun” signifies the meticulous scrutiny and verification of information, particularly when it originates from an untrustworthy source (a “fasiq”). This process aligns with Ayer’s emphasis on verifying meaningful propositions, ensuring the quest for clear truths in both philosophy and Islamic jurisprudence