Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of using corrected calcium versus total calcium on hypercalcemia case detection in hospitalized patients. MethodsPatients hospitalized from June 2012 to June 2017 with a corrected calcium level of ≥10.5 mg/dL were identified by medical record review. One-year follow-up data through June 2018 were acquired. Albumin-corrected calcium level was calculated: (4 − albumin concentration in g/dL) × 0.8 + total serum calcium in mg/dL. ResultsA group of 1067 patients had a corrected calcium level of ≥10.5 mg/dL. The prevalence of hypercalcemia was 0.73% with total calcium and 1.09% with corrected calcium, respectively, with a 49% relative increase. Most patients (62%) had mild hypercalcemia (10.5-11.9 mg/dL); 3.7% had severe hypercalcemia (>14 mg/dL). With corrected calcium, the most common categories of hypercalcemia were malignancy (35.4%), hypercalcemia that was not further evaluated (31.1%), and hyperparathyroidism (22.4%). All patients in the unidentified category had albumin levels <2.8 g/dL. At the 1-year follow–up, 63% of the unidentified cases had normal calcium levels, and 26.8% had mild persistent hypercalcemia. Of those with persisting hypercalcemia at 1 year, 16.8% were diagnosed with hyperparathyroidism. ConclusionUsing albumin-corrected calcium resulted in an ∼50% increase in the detection of hypercalcemia cases. Although hypercalcemia resolved in majority of the undiagnosed cases at 1 year, a number of these remained abnormal. Detecting hypercalcemic disorders by correcting for low albumin level can help identify conditions such as hyperparathyroidism. Adding auto-calculated albumin-corrected calcium to routine laboratory tests could be a cost-effective intervention to improve the detection of hypercalcemic disorders.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call