Abstract
Corporate planners usually have two main considerations when deciding where to locate big new industrial projects: access to cheap raw materials and proximity to customers. But as corporations and countries develop strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions—down to zero by midcentury, in many cases—a new priority is emerging for planners: choosing a location that allows them to dispose of the carbon dioxide their new facilities will generate. Large industrial plants are meant to last decades, so planners need a solution for carbon now if they want to hit their own net-zero targets for 2050. Increasingly, the advantage is going to places that already put a price on carbon—either through taxes or trading schemes—and have the infrastructure and geological potential to sequester CO 2 below ground. Alberta is one such place. The Canadian province has always attracted oil and chemical investment. It produces 4 million barrels of oil per day, about
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.