Abstract
Assessing the riskiness of investments in civil works is an integral part of the decision-making process. The main limitation is the absence, both in the regulatory landscape and in the literature of the sector, of threshold values that can guide the analyst in expressing an assessment on the acceptance of the investment risk. The aim of the paper is to define a risk management model that overcomes this gap by introducing acceptability and tolerability thresholds for project risk. The idea is to jointly use: (i) the As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) logic, from which the concepts threshold of acceptability and tolerability of risk derive, for the first time applied to assess the project risk in the civil field; (ii) the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and statistical methods to define an innovative methodology for estimating the aforementioned threshold values. According to the proposed approach, these risk limit values can be specified according to both the investment sector and the socio-economic context of the project. The implementation of the methodology in the civil company sector in Europe allows to validate the described model. The elaborations show that the financial performance of the project is widely acceptable if the Expected Internal Rate of Return is greater than 7.8%; unacceptable if the expected rate of return is less than 5.6%; and tolerable as an ALARP if the expected rate is between 5.6% and 7.8%. The estimated acceptability and tolerability thresholds can provide the economic operator with a more immediate and consistent evaluation of the triangular balance of risks, costs, and benefits. This allows the decision-making process to become more rational and transparent.
Highlights
There are many definitions of risk in the literature
The elaborations show that the financial performance of the project is widely acceptable if the Expected Internal Rate of Return is greater than 7.8%; unacceptable if the expected rate of return is less than 5.6%; and tolerable as an As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) if the expected rate is between 5.6% and 7.8%
By introducing the ALAPR logic in the Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) procedural scheme, we provide objective criteria to establish whether the probability of investment failure is unacceptable, ALARP, or widely acceptable for the economic operator
Summary
There are many definitions of risk in the literature. According to the Society of Risk Analysis [1], risk is «the potential realization of unwanted and negative consequences arising from an event». If regulatory guidelines and sector literature provide indications for estimating investment risk, there are no specific references for stable within which range this risk can be considered acceptable for the investor In this sense, by introducing the ALAPR logic in the CBA procedural scheme, we provide objective criteria to establish whether the probability of investment failure is unacceptable, ALARP, or widely acceptable for the economic operator. The defined risk management model shows the importance of providing in guidelines and regulations, methods for estimating the probability of investment failure, and useful approaches for assessing the acceptability of risk based on threshold values. The last section shows the results of the study, and possible research perspectives
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
