Abstract

Alarm symptoms are frequently present in patients with dyspepsia.Two-thirds of patients with alarm symptoms are investigated promptly, mainly by endoscopy.Investigation depends on the type of alarm symptom, and on the age, gender and dwelling of the patient.94% of patients with subsequently diagnosed cancers or ulcers were investigated promptly.Objective – Alarm symptoms are present in 10% of patients consulting a general practitioner (GP) because of dyspepsia. The options for the GP are: perform “own” investigation, refer to a specialist or secondary care, or maintain watchful waiting.Design – Postal questionnaire to GPs obtaining information from the records of patients who had consulted earlier owing to dyspepsia and reported one or more alarm symptoms at the consultation.Setting – 92 general practices throughout Denmark.Subjects – In 7240 consecutive consultations in 1991–1992 a total of 749 patients reported 881 alarm symptoms. Follow-up data 3 years later were obtained from 81%.Main outcome measures – The management of alarm symptoms by GPs: “own” investigation, referral to specialist, or expectance; procedures used in “own” investigations, patient characteristics related to such decisions, and gastrointestinal diseases diagnosed by this management.Results – 67% of the patients with alarm symptoms were investigated promptly (8% by referral to specialists) and 33% were left uninvestigated, with great variations between alarm symptoms. The single most preferred GP investigation was endoscopy. A gastrointestinal diagnosis was obtained in 35% of the patients; 3% of these were malignancies while 9% were peptic ulcers.Conclusion – The decision on whether and how to investigate alarm symptoms is complex and relates to specific symptom, type of dyspepsia, age, gender and dwelling of the patient.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call