Abstract

BackgroundSugar plays a central role as a source of carbon metabolism and energy production and a signaling molecule in diverse growth and developmental processes and environmental adaptation in plants. It is known that sugar metabolism and allocation between different physiological functions is intimately associated with flowering transition in many plant species. The INDETERMINATE DOMAIN (IDD)-containing transcription factor IDD8 regulates flowering time by modulating sugar metabolism and transport under sugar-limiting conditions in Arabidopsis. Meanwhile, it has been reported that SUCROSE NONFERMENTING-1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE 1 (SnRK1), which acts as a sensor of cellular energy metabolism, is activated by sugar deprivation. Notably, SnRK1-overexpressing plants and IDD8-deficient mutants exhibit similar phenotypes, including delayed flowering, suggesting that SnRK1 is involved in the IDD8-mediated metabolic control of flowering.ResultsWe examined whether the sugar deprivation-sensing SnRK1 is functionally associated with IDD8 in flowering time control through biochemical and molecular genetic approaches. Overproduction of AKIN10, the catalytic subunit of SnRK1, delayed flowering in Arabidopsis, as was observed in IDD8-deficient idd8-3 mutant. We found that AKIN10 interacts with IDD8 in the nucleus. Consequently, AKIN10 phosphorylates IDD8 primarily at two serine (Ser) residues, Ser-178 and Ser-182, which reside in the fourth zinc finger (ZF) domain that mediates DNA binding and protein-protein interactions. AKIN10-mediated phosphorylation did not affect the subcellular localization and DNA-binding property of IDD8. Instead, the transcriptional activation activity of the phosphorylated IDD8 was significantly reduced. Together, these observations indicate that AKIN10 antagonizes the IDD8 function in flowering time control, a notion that is consistent with the delayed flowering phenotypes of AKIN10-overexpressing plants and idd8-3 mutant.ConclusionOur data show that SnRK1 and its substrate IDD8 constitute a sugar metabolic pathway that mediates the timing of flowering under sugar deprivation conditions. In this signaling scheme, the SnRK1 signals are directly integrated into the IDD8-mediated gene regulatory network that governs flowering transition in response to fluctuations in sugar metabolism, further supporting the metabolic control of flowering.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12870-015-0503-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Sugar plays a central role as a source of carbon metabolism and energy production and a signaling molecule in diverse growth and developmental processes and environmental adaptation in plants

  • We demonstrated that Arabidopsis SNF1 kinase homolog 10 (AKIN10), which is the catalytic subunit of SUCROSE NONFERMENTING-1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE 1 (SnRK1) kinases [27], negatively regulates the transcriptional activation activity of IDD8 transcription factor through protein phosphorylation

  • We aimed to improve our understanding on how IDD8 perceives sugar deprivation signals in regulating photoperiodic flowering

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sugar plays a central role as a source of carbon metabolism and energy production and a signaling molecule in diverse growth and developmental processes and environmental adaptation in plants. It is known that sugar metabolism and allocation between different physiological functions is intimately associated with flowering transition in many plant species. Flowering time is precisely regulated through the coordinated actions of endogenous developmental cues, such as plant aging and gibberellic acid (GA), and environmental signals, including changes in the length of day or photoperiod and temperature [1,2,3]. Accumulating evidence support that sugar metabolism and distribution is intimately associated with flowering time control in many plant species [1,6]. It is widely perceived that plants do not flower even under photo-inductive conditions until they accumulate enough sugar reserves for the induction of flowering [6,7,8], which is consistent with the observations that low-starch-containing mutants, such as pgm and pgi, exhibit retarded growth and delayed flowering [9,10]. Endogenous sugar levels are directly linked with photosynthetic carbon assimilation [6], indicating that photosynthetic activity influences flowering transition [11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call