Abstract

Introduction. 350 years ago, the Peasant War of 1670–1671 began, which received the name of the Second Peasant War in Russia. It acquired the greatest scope in the Volga region, and in Volga lands, namely on the territory of Mordovia. At the beginning of the XVII century, the Mordovians unified in the defense of Moscow state, playing an important role in the expulsion of aggressors and the restoration of central power. There were good reasons for rising up against this power. Materials and Methods. These events are reflected in a variety of documentary sources, including the fundamental edition in several volumes published by USSR Academy of Sciences and many other studies, which conclusions unfortunately not always corresponded to these sources. The author uses the historiographic method, which includes the principles of historicism, objectivity and the method of logical analysis. The material of the material used the problem-chronological method. Results and Discussion. National historiography developed an opinion that the Second Peasant War was an uprising, a movement of primarily social causes class, led by Stepan Razin, and on the territory of Mordovia by Mikhail Kharitonov, his envoy. The analysis of the sources does not support the proof for it. According to them, the main events of the Peasant War took place in the Volga region after Razin’s flight to the Don, and the leader of the uprising in the region was Akai Boliaev, Mordovian stanitsa Murza. Conclusion. After analyzing the sources and subject literature, the author came to the conclusion that the main reason for the uprising in the region was a consequence of the interaction of social, political and national liberation factors.

Highlights

  • The article presents the results of research of the geographical vocabulary of the Shilan dialect, one of the Erzya-Mordovian dialects of the Samara region, common among Erzya population of Shilan village in Krasnoyarsk region

  • The analysis of the geographical vocabulary of the Shilan dialect is carried out with the involvement of relevant items made in other Mordovian dialects of Samara region, adjacent territories of neighboring regions, as well as other territories of settlement of the Mordovians

  • This paper considers some features of noun morphology in the translation of the “Gospel of Luke” (1821) into the Erzya language, namely the indicators of such grammatical categories of the noun as number, case and the categories of possessiveness and definiteness

Read more

Summary

Полевой материал автора

Также обращает на себя внимание тот факт, что в мордовских говорах немногочисленных для Самарского Поволжья сел, основанных, как и Шилан, в XIX в., термин ляй/лей присутствует и является топогенетичным. В шиланском говоре полностью отсутствует термин эрьке, что составляет редчайшую для мордовских говоров Самарского Поволжья ситуацию. Согласно данным наших полевых исследований, во многих мордовских говорах региона термин эрьке в значении ‘озеро’ в настоящее время также не используется – в основном ввиду вытеснения заимствованием из русского языка. Что в большинстве мордовских говоров Самарского Поволжья данный термин, при наличии в географическом лексиконе, топогенетичным не является. В большинстве эрзя-мордовских говоров Самарского Поволжья термин имеет именно такую форму и, как и в шиланском говоре, топогенетичным не является. 14 ПМА: Самарская область, Клявлинский район, запись 2019 г.

Introduction
14. Основы финно-угорского языкознания
14. Fundamentals of Finno-Ugric linguistics
В статье использован материал публикаций
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call