Abstract

1562 The efficacy of impulse oscillometry (IOS) to measure change in airway resistance is yet to be established. PURPOSE: To evaluate lung function change after eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation and compare IOS and maximal expiratory flow measurements. METHODS: Seventeen subjects (8 AHR+, 9 AHR−) performed a 6-min eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation challenge (EVH) at 85% MVV. Pre- and 5-, 10-, and 15-min post-IOS and spirometry were performed to determine change in airway resistance (Raw) and FEV1. Lung function evaluation required the subject to breathe at resting tidal volumes for 30 s for IOS measurements; a maximal expiratory flow volume maneuver immediately followed the IOS maneuver. RESULTS: AHR+ subjects had significantly greater peak falls in FEV1 than AHR- subjects following EVH (31.7 ± 15.7 vs 8.1 ± 1.67, p<0.05). Likewise, airway resistance (Raw) was significantly greater for AHR+ than for AHR- subjects (8.3 ± 3.73 vs 3.10 ± 0.97, p<0.05). Raw at 5Hz was strongly correlated to FEV1 in AHR+ subjects and AHR- subjects (r = −0.77 and −0.59; p<0.05). Resonant frequency (Fres) and the area of reactance integrated from 5Hz to Fres were also significantly correlated to FEV1 (r = −0.77 and – 0.73; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: IOS can be used to determine AHR and supplement spirometry in lung function evaluation. Supported in part by VIASYS Health Care.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call