Abstract

Reliable and predictive in vitro assays for hazard assessments of manufactured nanomaterials (MNMs) are still limited. Specifically, exposure systems which more realistically recapitulate the physiological conditions in the lung are needed to predict pulmonary toxicity. To this end, air-liquid interface (ALI) systems have been developed in recent years which might be better suited than conventional submerged exposure assays. However, there is still a need for rigorous side-by-side comparisons of the results obtained with the two different exposure methods considering numerous parameters, such as different MNMs, cell culture models and read outs. In this study, human A549 lung epithelial cells and differentiated THP-1 macrophages were exposed under submerged conditions to two abundant types of MNMs i.e., ceria and titania nanoparticles (NPs). Membrane integrity, metabolic activity as well as pro-inflammatory responses were recorded. For comparison, A549 monocultures were also exposed at the ALI to the same MNMs. In the case of titania NPs, genotoxicity was also investigated. In general, cells were more sensitive at the ALI compared to under classical submerged conditions. Whereas ceria NPs triggered only moderate effects, titania NPs clearly initiated cytotoxicity, pro-inflammatory gene expression and genotoxicity. Interestingly, low doses of NPs deposited at the ALI were sufficient to drive adverse outcomes, as also documented in rodent experiments. Therefore, further development of ALI systems seems promising to refine, reduce or even replace acute pulmonary toxicity studies in animals.

Highlights

  • All NPs strongly agglomerated when suspended in cell culture medium without FBS

  • The particle mass concentration in the aerosol was calculated according to the material density of the particles and the particle number distribution measured by scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) (Table 2)

  • The development of advanced air-liquid interface (ALI) exposure systems contributes to the establishment of predictive in vitro tests which would simulate the in vivo situation during inhalation much more accurately than available submerged assays [3,6,14]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In vitro exposure to airborne MNMs is technically challenging and labor extensive because an aerosol has to be generated, conditioned for temperature and humidity and applied to a cell surface which is not covered with medium. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 65 exposure to particle suspensions is much easier, most in vitro studies are performed this way. This approach does not represent the conditions which occur during inhalation [5,6], and may not provide accurate hazard assessments. By contrast, the particles are deposited linearly over a defined period This may have an effect on the quality and intensity of the biological effects

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call