Abstract
A hub carrier operates one hub linking multiple non-hub cities. It merges with a low cost carrier whose nonstop service competes with its one-stop service. The merged airline's profit is maximized by withdrawing the competing one-stop (nonstop) service when the hub carrier's operating cost and connecting passengers' hub-through additional time costs are large (small). The realized merger is welfare-improving (welfare-decreasing) when these costs are large or small (intermediate). These findings suggest the necessity of merger regulation. In some regions, the necessity of regulation does not monotonically change as network size increases.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
