Abstract
Airlines received an unpleasant Christmas present in 2008, in the form of the Court of Justice’s preliminary ruling in Wallentin-Hermann v. Alitalia, adopting a very strict interpretation of the ‘extraordinary circumstances’ defence to claims for compensation in the event of cancellation of flights under EU Regulation 261/2004. On 19 November 2009, the Court of Justice issued an even more stunning ruling interpreting the Regulation, in the joined cases Sturgeon v. Condor and Böck and Lepuschitz v. Air France, on references from courts in Austria and Germany. After giving some clarification on the distinction between delay and cancellation, the Court held that passengers on flights whose arrival at final destination is delayed by three hours or more are entitled to compensation, even though this is not expressly provided for in the Regulation (unlike in the case of cancellation).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.