Abstract

Exposure to laboratory animal allergens remains a significant cause of IgE-mediated occupational allergy and asthma. Since 2005, we have measured the major mouse and rat allergens (mus m 1 and rat n 1) collected on filters from air sampling in a range of UK and non-UK animal facilities. Supplied core data allowed us to construct an anonymized database of atmospheric results in ng m–3 containing 3080 mouse and 1392 rat analyses. Roughly twice as many static samples compared to personal samples had been sent for analysis. The medians (90th percentiles) for the mouse and rat allergens employing personal atmospheric sampling were 2.6 (60.6) and 0.4 (12.4) ng m–3 respectively; for static samples the equivalent values were 0.2 (3.7) and 0.1 (1.4) ng m–3. Where unequivocal sample descriptors were provided with samples, results were categorised to activities/areas. Medians and 90th percentiles in these categories suggest that staff undertaking cleaning out, dumping of soiled bedding and cleaning cages can still have very substantial potential exposures in some facilities. The move to filtered cages appears to reduce general exposure, but filter changing and/or cleaning can lead to high exposures. In some facilities, animal receipt can cause significant exposures, as well as activities such as bleeding, culling and dosing; all activities involving the handling of animals outside of cages. We believe that the data presented may help those using air measurements in such facilities to improve their control of exposure to such aeroallergens, and thus reduce the risk of both sensitisation and subsequent allergic health problems, including the development of allergic asthma.

Highlights

  • The use of animals remains pivotal in many scientific and medical research studies undertaken in the pharmaceutical sector, contract toxicology laboratories, research institutes and universities

  • The long-term, inter-assay coefficients of imprecision based on internal quality control samples are 14% and 21% for mus m 1 and rat n 1 respectively

  • Three thousand and eighty results for mus m 1 and 1392 rat n 1 met the inclusion criteria for analysis in this study and this reflects around 63% and 53% respectively of the total number of mus m 1 and rat n 1 samples sent to Health and Safety Laboratory (HSL) for analysis over this period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of animals remains pivotal in many scientific and medical research studies undertaken in the pharmaceutical sector, contract toxicology laboratories, research institutes and universities. This is despite considerable activity to reduce their use and find alternative in-vitro, experimental models. Airborne exposure to LAA, especially from mice and rats, is well recognised as causing sensitisation and subsequent ocular, nasal, upper and lower respiratory symptoms [2,3]. Besides provoking a range of symptoms in sensitised individuals, LAA are a proven [5] and major cause of occupational asthma. In 1999/2000 the annual UK incidence of asthma in those occupationally handling small animals was estimated as 1.56/1000 workers [6], this incidence rate appears to have reduced since 2010 [7]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call