Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the presence of air trapping in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) (non-IPF), showing the radiological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Retrospectively, we included 69 consecutive patients showing the typical UIP pattern on computed tomography (CT), and 15 final diagnosis of IPF with CT pattern “inconsistent with UIP” due to extensive air trapping. Air trapping at CT was assessed qualitatively by visual analysis and quantitatively by automated-software. In the quantitative analysis, significant air trapping was defined as >6% of voxels with attenuation between −950 to −856 HU on expiratory CT (expiratory air trapping index [ATIexp]) or an expiratory to inspiratory (E/I) ratio of mean lung density >0.87. The sample comprised 51 (60.7%) cases of IPF and 33 (39.3%) cases of non-IPF ILD. Most patients did not have air trapping (E/I ratio ≤0.87, n = 53, [63.1%]; ATIexp ≤6%, n = 45, [53.6%]). Air trapping in the upper lobes was the only variable distinguishing IPF from non-IPF ILD (prevalence, 3.9% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, air trapping is common in patients with ILDs showing a UIP pattern on CT, as determined by qualitative and quantitative evaluation, and should not be considered to be inconsistent with UIP. On subjective visual assessment, air trapping in the upper lobes was associated with a non-IPF diagnoses.

Highlights

  • This study was conducted to evaluate the presence of air trapping in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), showing the radiological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)

  • According to the 2011 ATS/ERS/JRS/ ALAT guidelines[1], a UIP pattern on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in the absence of any identifiable cause of another ILDs is sufficient for the diagnosis of IPF, and surgical lung biopsy (SLB) is not necessary to confirm the diagnosis in such cases

  • Alegre Hospital and waiver of the requirement for patient consent, we retrospectively identified 101 consecutive patients who presented with the UIP pattern on chest computed tomography (CT) between July 2012 and December 2017, regardless of the presence of air trapping on CT

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study was conducted to evaluate the presence of air trapping in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) (non-IPF), showing the radiological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Air trapping in the upper lobes was the only variable distinguishing IPF from non-IPF ILD (prevalence, 3.9% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001). Air trapping is common in patients with ILDs showing a UIP pattern on CT, as determined by qualitative and quantitative evaluation, and should not be considered to be inconsistent with UIP. The presence of extensive (i.e. in three or more lobes) air trapping on HRCT is currently considered to be a finding “inconsistent with UIP”, and SLB may be necessary in such cases[1]. A secondary aim was to examine the utility of different quantitative measurements of air trapping as CT biomarkers for the risk of death or lung transplantation in patients with IPF

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call