Abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine if a common air medical curriculum exists among Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) emergency medicine (EM) residencies. MethodsInstitutional review board exemption was obtained. A cross-sectional survey study design was used. All ACGME-approved EM residencies as of February 2013 were identified, and the program directors were e-mailed a 3-question survey. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each response, and a response bias analysis was completed. ResultsAll 160 ACGME EM residencies were contacted by e-mail. One hundred six (66%) programs responded. Sixty-nine (65%) of the respondents offered an air medical experience. Only 25 of the 69 (36%) stated that they had a formal air medical curriculum, and 15 programs provided a copy of their curriculum. Protocol education was present in 80% of programs. Safety training was present in 60% of the programs. Financial education was present in 7% of programs. There was no statistically significant difference between responders and nonresponders except for residency class size. ConclusionAfter 30 years of published articles and position statements calling for standardized air medical resident crew member training, there is still no standardized training program among emergency medicine residencies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
