Abstract

Purpose: Success of clinical trials increasingly relies on effective selection of the target patient populations. We hypothesize that computational analysis of pre-accrual imaging data can be used for patient enrichment to better identify patients who can potentially benefit from investigational agents. Methods: This was tested retrospectively in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients accrued into a randomized clinical trial (SARC021) that evaluated the efficacy of evofosfamide (Evo), a hypoxia activated prodrug, in combination with doxorubicin (Dox). Notably, SARC021 failed to meet its overall survival (OS) objective. We tested whether a radiomic biomarker-driven inclusion/exclusion criterion could have been used to improve the difference between the two arms (Evo + Dox vs. Dox) of the study. 164 radiomics features were extracted from 296 SARC021 patients with lung metastases, divided into training and test sets. Results: A single radiomics feature, Short Run Emphasis (SRE), was representative of a group of correlated features that were the most informative. The SRE feature value was combined into a model along with histological classification and smoking history. This model as able to identify an enriched subset (52%) of patients who had a significantly longer OS in Evo + Dox vs. Dox groups [p = 0.036, Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.64 (0.42–0.97)]. Applying the same model and threshold value in an independent test set confirmed the significant survival difference [p = 0.016, HR = 0.42 (0.20–0.85)]. Notably, this model was best at identifying exclusion criteria for patients most likely to benefit from doxorubicin alone. Conclusions: The study presents a first of its kind clinical-radiomic approach for patient enrichment in clinical trials. We show that, had an appropriate model been used for selective patient inclusion, SARC021 trial could have met its primary survival objective for patients with metastatic STS.

Highlights

  • In the last decade, there has been an explosion in the use of advanced image analysis with machine learning, known as “Radiomics” [1,2]

  • Presence of lung metastasis was associated with significantly poorer overall survival in the entire cohort of 607 patients (p = 0.007, Hazard Ratios (HR) = 1.34 (1.09–1.65))

  • Among patients with lung metastases, no significant survival difference was observed between the two treatment groups (p = 0.8), to the entire cohort (p = 0.45)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been an explosion in the use of advanced image analysis with machine learning, known as “Radiomics” [1,2]. Radiomic analyses of cancer can be used to stage, prognose patient outcome, predict response to specific therapies and, most recently, to inform therapeutic choices [3] with increasing connectivity between image features and tumor biology [4] This promising method has to date not been able to compare two treatments and choose an optimal therapeutic approach or identify patients likely to benefit from one drug over another. We aimed to develop an appropriate model, allowing for radiomic approaches to be used in clinical trials for patient enrichment We tested this hypothesis in a retrospective analysis of data from the SARC021 [5] phase III clinical trial in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma that compared overall survival (OS) in cohorts treated with doxorubicin (Dox) to those treated with Dox + Evofosfamide (Evo), a hypoxia activated pro-drug of a brominated version of isophosphoramide mustard (NCT01440088). Dox + Evo had shown promise for sarcoma in phase II [6], the phase III trial failed to meet its threshold of increased OS in the Dox + Evo cohort [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.