Abstract

Agroforestry, relative to conventional agriculture, contributes significantly to carbon sequestration, increases a range of regulating ecosystem services, and enhances biodiversity. Using a transdisciplinary approach, we combined scientific and technical knowledge to evaluate nine environmental pressures in terms of ecosystem services in European farmland and assessed the carbon storage potential of suitable agroforestry systems, proposed by regional experts. First, regions with potential environmental pressures were identified with respect to soil health (soil erosion by water and wind, low soil organic carbon), water quality (water pollution by nitrates, salinization by irrigation), areas affected by climate change (rising temperature), and by underprovision in biodiversity (pollination and pest control pressures, loss of soil biodiversity). The maps were overlaid to identify areas where several pressures accumulate. In total, 94.4% of farmlands suffer from at least one environmental pressure, pastures being less affected than arable lands. Regional hotspots were located in north-western France, Denmark, Central Spain, north and south-western Italy, Greece, and eastern Romania. The 10% of the area with the highest number of accumulated pressures were defined as Priority Areas, where the implementation of agroforestry could be particularly effective. In a second step, European agroforestry experts were asked to propose agroforestry practices suitable for the Priority Areas they were familiar with, and identified 64 different systems covering a wide range of practices. These ranged from hedgerows on field boundaries to fast growing coppices or scattered single tree systems. Third, for each proposed system, the carbon storage potential was assessed based on data from the literature and the results were scaled-up to the Priority Areas. As expected, given the wide range of agroforestry practices identified, the carbon sequestration potentials ranged between 0.09 and 7.29 t C ha−1 a−1. Implementing agroforestry on the Priority Areas could lead to a sequestration of 2.1 to 63.9 million t C a−1 (7.78 and 234.85 million t CO2eq a−1) depending on the type of agroforestry. This corresponds to between 1.4 and 43.4% of European agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Moreover, promoting agroforestry in the Priority Areas would contribute to mitigate the environmental pressures identified there. We conclude that the strategic and spatially targeted establishment of agroforestry systems could provide an effective means of meeting EU policy objectives on GHG emissions whilst providing a range of other important benefits.

Highlights

  • Increased market price volatility and the risks of changing climate are - according to the EU Agricultural Markets Briefs (September 2017) – the biggest challenges European farmers will face in near future (DG Agriculture and Rural Development, 2017)

  • Areas suffering from an annual loss greater than 5 t soil ha−1 a-1 by wind erosion were relatively small (1.5%), whereas a low Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) saturation capacity was present on 58.7% of arable lands and on 12.8% of pastures

  • We investigated the potential for implementing agroforestry in agricultural areas subject to multiple environmental pressures of agricultural land in Europe and its contribution to European climate and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Increased market price volatility and the risks of changing climate are - according to the EU Agricultural Markets Briefs (September 2017) – the biggest challenges European farmers will face in near future (DG Agriculture and Rural Development, 2017). Facing the complex relationship between competitive farming and sustainable production, the current Common Agricultural Policy (CAP, the European framework for agricultural subsidies), supports farmers’ income, market measures and rural development (European Commission, 2016). In spite of crosscompliance mechanism and the recently introduced greening measure that links environmental standards to subsidies, the agricultural sector is still one of the prime causes of pressure on natural resources and the environment (EEA, 2017a). To address these environmental problems, the European Commission has issued policies such as the Nitrate Directive (91/676/CEE) in 1991, the Water Framework Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC) in 2000 and the Biodiversity Strategy in 2010 (COM(2011) 244). Most recently and in line with the COP21 Paris Agreement (UNFCCC, 2015) the Effort Sharing 2021–2030 (REGULATION (EU) 2018/842) includes agricultural practices, aiming to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or balance with an equal amount of GHG sequestration

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.