Abstract

Abstract. It is generally known that managed, drained peatlands act as carbon (C) sources. In this study we examined how mitigation through the reduction of the intensity of land management and through rewetting may affect the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission and the C balance of intensively managed, drained, agricultural peatlands. Carbon and GHG balances were determined for three peatlands in the western part of the Netherlands from 2005 to 2008 by considering spatial and temporal variability of emissions (CO2, CH4 and N2O). One area (Oukoop) is an intensively managed grass-on-peatland area, including a dairy farm, with the ground water level at an average annual depth of 0.55 (±0.37) m below the soil surface. The second area (Stein) is an extensively managed grass-on-peatland area, formerly intensively managed, with a dynamic ground water level at an average annual depth of 0.45 (±0.35) m below the soil surface. The third area is a (since 1998) rewetted former agricultural peatland (Horstermeer), close to Oukoop and Stein, with the average annual ground water level at a depth of 0.2 (±0.20) m below the soil surface. During the measurement campaigns we found that both agriculturally managed sites acted as C and GHG sources and the rewetted former agricultural peatland acted as a C and GHG sink. The ecosystem (fields and ditches) total GHG balance, including CO2, CH4 and N2O, amounted to 3.9 (±0.4), 1.3 (±0.5) and −1.7 (±1.8) g CO2-eq m−2 d−1 for Oukoop, Stein and Horstermeer, respectively. Adding the farm-based emissions to Oukoop and Stein resulted in a total GHG emission of 8.3 (±1.0) and 6.6 (±1.3) g CO2-eq m−2 d−1, respectively. For Horstermeer the GHG balance remained the same since no farm-based emissions exist. Considering the C balance (uncertainty range 40–60%), the total C release in Oukoop and Stein is 5270 and 6258 kg C ha−1 yr−1, respectively (including ecosystem and management fluxes), and the total C uptake in Horstermeer is 3538 kg C ha−1 yr−1. Water bodies contributed significantly to the terrestrial GHG balance because of a high release of CH4. Overall, this study suggests that managed peatlands are large sources of GHGs and C, but, if appropriate measures are taken, they can be turned back into GHG and C sinks within 15 years of abandonment and rewetting. The shift from an intensively managed grass-on-peat area (Oukoop) to an extensively managed one (Stein) reduced the GHG emissions mainly because N2O emission and farm-based CH4 emissions decreased.

Highlights

  • Peatlands cover only 6 % of the terrestrial surface of the Earth, they play a central role in the global carbon (C) cycle (Gorham et al, 2012)

  • While natural peatlands act as sinks for C, agricultural peatlands commonly act as sources for C and greenhouse gas (GHG)

  • Significant differences in GHG emissions have previously been reported between landscape elements within these three sites: CH4 emissions from drainage ditches and saturated soil were significantly higher compared to CH4 emissions from the relatively dry land (Schrier-Uijl et al, 2009; Hendriks et al, 2007) and CH4 fluxes from shallow lakes in the peat area contribute significantly to the GHG balance (Schrier-Uijl et al, 2010)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Peatlands cover only 6 % of the terrestrial surface of the Earth, they play a central role in the global carbon (C) cycle (Gorham et al, 2012). Schrier-Uijl et al.: Agricultural peatlands: towards a greenhouse gas sink capture C as carbon dioxide (CO2) with a long-term average uptake rate of 25 g C m−2 yr−1 (Borren et al, 2006). Nitrous oxide (N2O) does not play a significant role in the greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets of natural peatlands. While natural peatlands act as sinks for C, agricultural peatlands commonly act as sources for C and GHGs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call