Abstract

Anders Danielson is critical of our 1984 article on three grounds, all of which are based, in our judgment, on his incorrect understanding of what we were attempting to say. Perhaps our exposition was at fault, perhaps his reading, but the matter is easily cleared up. First, we do not see that his equation (4) has anything to do with any of our equations. If one inserts our equation (1) into our equation (2) and rearranges terms so as to solve for O/P, one arrives at

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call