Abstract
This archival study examines 42 mediated agreements reached in court-connected mediation in Denmark from two different perspectives: an interests and needs perspective and a discourse perspective. The study suggests that, to some extent, the parties’ respective interests and needs are reflected in the agreements. The study further suggests that, with the high degree of jargon and legal language that they contain, the agreements are more expressions of the professionals who drafted them rather than the parties to the cases, possibly therefore jeopardizing some of the intentions of mediation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
