Abstract

BackgroundMultimorbidity is a common phenomenon in primary care. Until now, no clinical guidelines for multimorbidity exist. For the development of these guidelines, it is necessary to know whether or not patients are aware of their diseases and to what extent they agree with their doctor. The objectives of this paper are to analyze the agreement of self-reported and general practitioner-reported chronic conditions among multimorbid patients in primary care, and to discover which patient characteristics are associated with positive agreement.MethodsThe MultiCare Cohort Study is a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study of 3,189 multimorbid patients, ages 65 to 85. Data was collected in personal interviews with patients and GPs. The prevalence proportions for 32 diagnosis groups, kappa coefficients and proportions of specific agreement were calculated in order to examine the agreement of patient self-reported and general practitioner-reported chronic conditions. Logistic regression models were calculated to analyze which patient characteristics can be associated with positive agreement.ResultsWe identified four chronic conditions with good agreement (e.g. diabetes mellitus κ = 0.80;PA = 0,87), seven with moderate agreement (e.g. cerebral ischemia/chronic stroke κ = 0.55;PA = 0.60), seventeen with fair agreement (e.g. cardiac insufficiency κ = 0.24;PA = 0.36) and four with poor agreement (e.g. gynecological problems κ = 0.05;PA = 0.10).Factors associated with positive agreement concerning different chronic diseases were sex, age, education, income, disease count, depression, EQ VAS score and nursing care dependency. For example: Women had higher odds ratios for positive agreement with their GP regarding osteoporosis (OR = 7.16). The odds ratios for positive agreement increase with increasing multimorbidity in almost all of the observed chronic conditions (OR = 1.22-2.41).ConclusionsFor multimorbidity research, the knowledge of diseases with high disagreement levels between the patients’ perceived illnesses and their physicians’ reports is important. The analysis shows that different patient characteristics have an impact on the agreement. Findings from this study should be included in the development of clinical guidelines for multimorbidity aiming to optimize health care. Further research is needed to identify more reasons for disagreement and their consequences in health care.Trial registrationISRCTN89818205

Highlights

  • Multimorbidity is a common phenomenon in primary care

  • For the development of clinical guidelines, it is important to know if patients are aware of their diseases and how much they agree with their doctor regarding these illnesses

  • The present study examined the agreement between self-reported and general practitioner-reported chronic conditions among multimorbid patients in primary care

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Multimorbidity is a common phenomenon in primary care. Until now, no clinical guidelines for multimorbidity exist. Many older people even have multiple chronic conditions The definition of multimorbidity, and the data sources (patient reports, claims data or collected through physician or medical records) seem to have a decisive influence on the measured prevalence of multimorbidity [4,5,6]. Another problem concerning multimorbidity are the missing clinical guidelines for medical practice [7,8]. For the development of clinical guidelines, it is important to know if patients are aware of their diseases and how much they agree with their doctor regarding these illnesses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call