Abstract
Agreement between radiological and clinical diagnosis and the incidence of unexpected findings has been used as an indicator of the diagnostic contribution of radiology. The overall incidence of agreement was 33% - 533 out of 1,604 x-ray examinations. The wide variation in agreement in different radiological examinations is clearly related to the pathological nature of disease and the limitations of radiological techniques. If diagnostic radiology is to be effective its application rather than interpretation in the clinical situation must be emphasized in training programmes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
