Abstract

To evaluate the agreement among instruments of the quantitative evaluation of hard palate. This cross-sectional study was performed with a sample of 30 children aged 6 to 11 from Santa Maria, Southern Brazil. The instruments for palate measurements evaluated were: digital caliper, used directly in the oral cavity and in plaster casts, Korkhaus tridimensional bow, used directly in the oral cavity and in plaster casts, and Dolphin Imaging Software used for measurements in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The agreement among different instruments was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The means of all transversal dimensions obtained by cone-beam computed tomography were lower than those of the other instruments - the agreement values in the width between the canines and in the width between the first molars were lower when comparing the cone-beam computed tomography and the other instruments. In the width between the first and second premolars, all comparisons showed acceptable agreement values. Good concordance values were obtained when comparing the palate depth at the second premolar region when using a bow divider inside the oral cavity and in the cast. Most instruments presented satisfactory agreement in the measurements related to the transverse plane of the hard palate. However, when the vertical plane was evaluated, only the bow divider applied to both cast and oral cavity presented ideal agreement.

Highlights

  • The hard palate is the bone structure that divides the oral and nasal cavities

  • The instruments for palate measurements evaluated were: digital caliper, used directly in the oral cavity and in plaster casts, Korkhaus tridimensional bow, used directly in the oral cavity and in plaster casts, and Dolphin Imaging Software used for measurements in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)

  • *p

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The hard palate is the bone structure that divides the oral and nasal cavities. Its anatomy is closely related to orofacial functional activities. Its morphological analysis is characterized as an important part of the clinical evaluation of speech therapists working in Orofacial Motricity, and of dentists who work in Orthodontics. When their dimensions are altered, it can be predicted that oral functions and/or breathing will be impaired, to a greater or lesser degree[1]. The caliper[2,3] and the Korkhaus tridimensional bow divider[4,5,6] are among the most frequently used instruments found in the literature They may be applied directly inside the oral cavity[4,6] or in plaster models[2,3,5]. The conceptual hypothesis was that different instruments yield similar and compatible results since all of them provide dimensions in millimeters

METHODS
Study design and sample
Method
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.