Aging × Genetics × Environment: Characterization of Precision Disease Models for Preclinical Testing for Late‐onset Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe ability to effectively translate therapeutic efficacy from the bench to clinical success for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been hampered in part due to limited recapitulation of the complexity of the disease in animal models. While analogous AD risk mutations have been engineered into animal models and have dominated the research field, these have primarily been familial, early onset risk alleles which do not capture the risk for AD for the majority of patients that present with sporadic late onset AD (LOAD).MethodThe IU/JAX/PITT MODEL‐AD consortium is focused on developing mouse models with genetic risk variants associated with LOAD, in combination with environmental risk factors and aging to enable improved translation. The present studies aimed to characterize mice expressing humanized Aβ in combination with multiple genetic risk factors (APOE4 and the R47H risk variant in the Trem2 gene; LOAD2) and aged in the presence of a high‐fat, high‐sugar diet (HFD).ResultLOAD2 mice exposed to HFD from adolescence (LOAD2+HFD) demonstrated aging changes relative to LOAD2 mice in the absence of HFD, including presentation of insoluble Aβ42 in brain and plasma, and increased inflammatory cytokines. 12‐month aged LOAD2+HFD mice also demonstrated increased NfL in CSF, as well as vascular and perfusion changes as measured by PET/MRI. By 18 months, LOAD2+HFD mice demonstrated reductions in hippocampal neurons as well as cognitive impairment relative to LOAD2 mice in the absence of HFD on a translational touchscreen task. Intriguingly, gene expression profiles and proteomic signatures of aged LOAD2+HFD mice aligned with ‘omics signatures of AD patients in the absence of core neuritic plaques, which were not detected up to 24 months of age.ConclusionMice with genetic risk for LOAD coupled with environmental risk factors demonstrate aging‐dependent changes in line with a spectrum and trajectory of features of clinical LOAD. From a precision medicine approach, our MODEL‐AD Preclinical Testing Core and our TREAT‐AD colleagues are prioritizing LOAD2+HFD mice as an important model system for evaluating the therapeutic potential of non‐amyloid targeting therapeutics as well as for prophylactic interventions initiated prior to significant amyloid accumulation.