Abstract
Otoliths (sagittae) were removed from a sample of 801 sablefish collected at sea from commercial otter trawl vessels in northern California from April through August 1984. This study presents a detailed examination of aging discrepancies between a) surface and b) broken and burnt (section) otolith aging methods, and considers possible mechanisms responsible for discrepancies. Sablefish age assignments based on the broken and burnt (section) aging method were higher than those based on surface aging for fish exceeding about 5-7 years section age. Beyond these ages, discrepancies increased with increasing section ages. The surface aging method assumes that there will be continual radial growth with increasing fish age, but otolith radius measurements showed that rate of radial growth dramatically decreased with increasing age and made surface aging unreliable for all but young fish. In contrast, otolith thickness measurements increased linearly with increasing section age and were highly correlated with section ages. When growth in length becomes slow, then surface ages are probably not accurate and discrepancies between surface and section ages dramatically increase with increasing section age.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.