Abstract

Background: Controversy exists over whether aggressive surgical resection of the primary tumor without metastasectomy first or chemotherapy first in stage IV colon cancer with unresectable synchronous liver-only-metastases (CLM) improves patients. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 156 patients initially diagnosed with unresectable synchronous CLM who were under treatment in our institution from January 2004 to December 2012. Patients with extrahepatic diseases or previous hepatic resection were excluded. All patients with a follow-up of at least 3 months were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Among the 156 patients with CLM, 43 (27.56%) received aggressive surgical resection of the primary tumor without metastasectomy first, 113 (72.43%) received systemic chemotherapy first. At 5 years, the adjusted PFS and OS in stage IV colon cancer with inoperable metastases were 24.2% and 20.4%, respectively, in the surgical resection of the primary tumor first group and 46.0% and 16.9% in the chemotherapy first group ( P = 0.515 and P = 0.742, respectively). In multivariate analysis, there was no statistical difference in the PFS and 5-year OS between the surgical resection of the primary tumor first group and chemotherapy first. Conclusion: Surgical resection of the primary tumor without metastasectomy first in CLM is not associated with improved survival as compared with chemotherapy first. Additional research is necessary to determine which patients may benefit from this intervention.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.