Abstract

Background/Purpose: In contrast with adult patients in whom surgical closure of the defect is preferred, nonoperative treatment has been the usual approach for esophageal perforation (EP) in children. This report aims to assess whether this strategy stands the passage of time. Methods: We reviewed retrospectively the charts of 17 patients aged 5.3 ± 0.9 years (mean ± SD) treated at our institution for EP between 1991 and 2001. Results: Nineteen episodes of EP were caused by stricture dilation in 9 cases, foreign body extraction in 3, and blunt trauma and sclerosis of varices in 2 cases each. The remaining child had multiple gastrointestinal perforations in the course of chemotherapy for leukemia. Vigorous treatment, consisting of nasopharyngeal aspiration, wide spectrum antibiotics, prompt drainage of effusions and either parenteral or infraesophageal nutritition, was implemented immediately after diagnosis. Perforations were closed without direct surgery in 18 of 19 episodes (16 of 17 children). One or more pleural drains were inserted in 12 cases, and pericardial drainage was required once. Seven gastrostomies, 2 jejunostomies, and one esophagostomy were performed. Several major abdominal operations were necessary to repair concomitant lesions in a child who sustained severe blunt abdominal trauma and in the patient with leukemic perforations. All patients survived, and all recovered esophageal function. However, 2 with intractable lye strictures ultimately required esophageal replacement. The only patient in whom a direct approach for esophageal necrosis due to variceal endosclerosis was unavoidable, lost her organ and had a retrosternal colonic interposition after a successful portosystemic shunt. Excluding patients with other concomitant lesions and the patient who underwent surgery, median length of stay was 11 days (range, 6 to 47). Conclusions: Prompt and aggressive nonoperative treatment of esophageal perforations in children allows survival with conservation of the organ in most cases and remains, in the authors' hands, the first therapeutic choice at this age. J Pediatr Surg 38:685-689. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.