Abstract

Group‐living is widespread among animals and comes with numerous costs and benefits. To date, research examining group‐living has focused on trade‐offs surrounding foraging, while other forms of resource acquisition have been largely overlooked.Air‐breathing has evolved in many fish lineages, allowing animals to obtain oxygen in hypoxic aquatic environments. Breathing air increases the threat of predation, so some species perform group air‐breathing, to reduce individual risk. Within species, individual air‐breathing can be influenced by metabolic rate as well as personality, but the mechanisms of group air‐breathing remain unexplored. It is conceivable that keystone individuals with high metabolic demand or intrinsic tendency to breathe air may drive social breathing, especially in hypoxia.We examined social air‐breathing in African sharptooth catfish Clarias gariepinus, to determine whether individual physiological traits and spontaneous tendency to breathe air influence the behaviour of entire groups, and whether such influences vary in relation to aquatic oxygen availability.We studied 11 groups of four catfish in a laboratory arena and recorded air‐breathing behaviour, activity and agonistic interactions at varying levels of hypoxia. Bimodal respirometry was used to estimate individual standard metabolic rate (SMR) and the tendency to utilize aerial oxygen when alone.Fish took more air breaths in groups as compared to when they were alone, regardless of water oxygen content, and displayed temporally clustered air‐breathing behaviour, consistent with existing definitions of synchronous air‐breathing. However, groups displayed tremendous variability in surfacing behaviour. Aggression by dominant individuals within groups was the main factor influencing air‐breathing of the entire group. There was no association between individual SMR, or the tendency to obtain oxygen from air when in isolation, and group air‐breathing.For C. gariepinus, synchronous air‐breathing is strongly influenced by agonistic interactions, which may expose subordinate individuals to risk of predation. Influential individuals exerted an overriding effect on risk‐taking by the entire group, for reasons independent of their physiological oxygen requirements. Overall, this illustrates that social context can obscure interactions between an individual's physiological and behavioural traits and their tendency to take risks to obtain resources.

Highlights

  • Group-­living is ubiquitous throughout the animal Kingdom and comes with a variety of costs and benefits (Krause & Ruxton, 2002; Ward & Webster, 2016)

  • These results demonstrate that variation in air-­breathing among groups of C. gariepinus is directly related to the amount of aggression occurring within social groups, with dominant individuals influencing the air-­breathing behaviour of the group as a whole

  • This could translate into key individuals driving the degree of risk that other group members’ experience. These observations provide an extraordinary example whereby the influence of keystone individuals shapes the behaviour of groupmates (Modlmeier et al, 2014; Pruitt & Keiser, 2014), but seemingly supersedes the role of intrinsic physiological resource demand and environmental resource

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Group-­living is ubiquitous throughout the animal Kingdom and comes with a variety of costs and benefits (Krause & Ruxton, 2002; Ward & Webster, 2016). The costs and benefits of group membership have almost exclusively focused on the trade-­off between foraging and predation risk, while other forms of resource acquisition remain largely unstudied (McKenzie, Belão, Killen, & Rantin, 2015) Oxygen is another essential resource that can be difficult or risky for some animals to obtain. Within air-­breathing species, there is considerable variation among individuals in their reliance on aerial respiration, which is dependent upon their metabolic rate and oxygen demand (Lefevre, Wang et al, 2014; McKenzie, Burlesson, & Randall, 1991; McKenzie et al, 2015; Smatresk, Burleson, & Azizi, 1986) It is a chemoreflex, air-­breathing in fishes has a large behavioural component (Chapman & McKenzie, 2009; Video S1).

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call