Abstract
From the previous chapters it should be clear that, until recently, the literature on judgment aggregation focused mainly on impossibility theorems and on devising ways to avoid such impossibility results. This is different from what happens in voting theory, where voting rules are defined and studied per se. And yet, as it became evident to the researchers gathered at the 2011 workshop “New Developments in Judgement Aggregation and Voting Theory”1 held in Freudenstadt (Germany), things are starting to change. Several researchers, from within different disciplines, independently began to define concrete aggregation rules for judgment aggregation. This chapter is dedicated to providing a snapshot of this young and ongoing line of research.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
