Abstract
Perfect aggregation in Bayesian system reliability analysis has been shown to be extremely unlikely. In other words, aggregation error is almost inevitable. Consequently, analysts have to deal with the following dilemma: on one hand, an aggregate analysis (i.e., an analysis at the system level), while relatively inexpensive, may be misleading. On the other hand, a disaggregate analysis (i.e., at the component level) provides more accurate results, but may be costly and impractical. Therefore, simple techniques to estimate the size of aggregation error are necessary to help analysts choose the most appropriate level of detail for an analysis. In this paper, reasonable bounds on the aggregation error are derived for a variety of reliability models. In particular, these bounds will never be more than twice the actual error. Tools to compute these bounds (and in some cases the actual error) are also provided.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
