Abstract
Strategy researchers are often faced with the convenience or the necessity of using existing data bases that were assembledfor purposes that differ from the research being conducted. Inferences drawn from this research can be overstated or can be simply wrong because researchers have ignored the pitfalls of translating results based on aggregated data to specific situations. Although these issues have been addressed in political science and sociology, they have not been discussed at length in the context of strategy research. This paper, there fore, explores "unit of analysis" problems specifically as they can occur in strategy research. Issues of independent and dependent variable grouping, contextual effects and examples of aggregation practices and errors typical in strategy research are presented.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
