Abstract
A decade has passed since I first raised questions in this journal (7, p. 63) about the issue of aggregate supply and about the com mon textbook approach to this concept within the narrow confines of the simple Keynesian model without money. Kehar Sangha (11, p. 67) and W. Robert Brazelton (1, pp. 69-70) subsequently commented and expanded upon my original paper. I, in turn, responded with a rejoinder (8, pp. 84-86) and Brazelton, in like manner, with a reply (2, pp. 70-72). It seems these questions have yet to be settled, however, as now even more fuel has been added to the controversy by Robert E. McAuliffe (6, pp. 76-77) and for a second time by Sangha (12, pp. 78-81). Again I am motivated to add commentary to points that, by way of these many exchanges, seem to have evolved beyond those raised in my orig inal paper.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
