Abstract
Many previous empirical studies of the Ricardian Equivalence Hypothesis have found a relatively high degree of future tax liability discounting such that current deficits appear to have relatively little or no influence on current consumption demand. However, the validity of these empirical estimates can be questioned as they may not have adequately distinguished between permanent and transitory income flows. This paper attempts to address this problem by using cycle‐averaging as a simple method of capturing the permanent path of income over time. The empirical evidence generated in this paper rejects the strict debt neutrality proposition of the Ricardian Equivalence Hypothesis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
