Abstract

BackgroundAge-specific prostate specific antigen (PSA) cutoffs for prostate biopsy have been widely used in the USA and European countries. However, the application of age-specific PSA remains poorly understood in China.MethodsBetween 2003 and 2012, 1,848 men over the age of 40, underwent prostate biopsy for prostate cancer (PCa) at Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China. Clinical information and blood samples were collected prior to biopsy for each patient. Men were divided into three age groups (≤60, 61 to 80, and >80) for analyses. Digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (prostate volume and nodule), total PSA (tPSA), and free PSA (fPSA) were also included in the analyses. Logistic regression was used to build the multi-variate model.ResultsSerum tPSA levels were age-dependent (P = 0.008), while %fPSA (P = 0.051) and PSAD (P = 0.284) were age-independent. At a specificity of 80%, the sensitivities for predicting PCa were 83%, 71% and 68% with tPSA cutoff values of 19.0 ng/mL (age≤60),21.0 ng/mL (age 61–80), and 23.0 ng/mL (age≥81). Also, sensitivities at the same tPSA levels were able to reach relatively high levels (70%–88%) for predicting high-grade PCa. Area (AUC) under the receive operating curves (ROCs) of tPSA, %fPSA, PSAD and multi-variate model were different in age groups. When predicting PCa, the AUC of tPSA, %fPSA, PSAD and multi-variate model were 0.90, 0.57, 0.93 and 0.87 respectively in men ≤60 yr; 0.82, 0.70, 0.88 and 0.86 respectively in men 61–80 yr; 0.79, 0.78, 0.87 and 0.88 respectively in men>80 yr. When predicting Gleason Score ≥7 or 8 PCa, there were no significant differences between AUCs of each variable.ConclusionAge-specific PSA cutoff values for prostate biopsy should be considered in the Chinese population. Indications for prostate biopsies (tPSA, %fPSA and PSAD) should be considered based on age in the Chinese population.

Highlights

  • Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and a leading cause of death among men in the world, with an estimated incidence of 903,500 cases, causing 258,400 death every year. [1] By the year of 2030, an estimated 500,000 men will die of PCa. [2] The incidence of PCa in China is still very low; it has risen rapidly over the last decade. [3,4].Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is one of the most important biomarkers for detecting prostate cancer and guiding decisions to biopsy the prostate

  • After decades of using prostate specific antigen (PSA) test, limitations have been observed, for instance, PSA test has low specificity, has poor ability to distinguish indolent form aggressive cancers. [7,8] Several tools were added to increase the specificity of PSA test, such as free PSA, ratio of free to total PSA (%fPSA), PSA density (PSAD), age-specific PSA cutoff values, PSA isoforms, etc

  • No significant differences were found in %fPSA (P = 0.051) and PSAD (P = 0.284) in age groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and a leading cause of death among men in the world, with an estimated incidence of 903,500 cases, causing 258,400 death every year. [1] By the year of 2030, an estimated 500,000 men will die of PCa. [2] The incidence of PCa in China is still very low; it has risen rapidly over the last decade. [3,4].Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is one of the most important biomarkers for detecting prostate cancer and guiding decisions to biopsy the prostate. Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and a leading cause of death among men in the world, with an estimated incidence of 903,500 cases, causing 258,400 death every year. After decades of using PSA test, limitations have been observed, for instance, PSA test has low specificity (which causes the over-diagnosis), has poor ability to distinguish indolent form aggressive cancers (which causes the over-treatment for indolent PCa). Age-specific prostate specific antigen (PSA) cutoffs for prostate biopsy have been widely used in the USA and European countries. The application of age-specific PSA remains poorly understood in China

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call